Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project Wiki
-> -> -> Search for "𧮲"
Transcribed automatically with OCR. Please help correct any errors.
Search details:
Scope: 讀書雜志+讀書雜志餘編
Condition : Contains text 「𧮲」
Total 6

八:漢書v5郊祀志~五行志

五行志·五曰思 思曰𧮲 𧮲作聖 思慮 宮為士為信為思

1
經曰五事一曰貎二曰言三曰視四曰聽五曰思貎曰恭言曰從視曰明聽曰聰思曰睿恭作肅從作非明作悊聰作謀𧮲作聖。應劭曰:𧮲通也,古文作睿。錢氏曉徵《攷異》曰:按伏生《傳》本作容。董生《春秋繁露》述五行五事云思曰容容者,言無不容又云:容作聖聖者設也王者心寬大無不𧮲則聖能施設事各𢔶其宐也此志說思心之不容云容寬也。孔子曰:居上不寬吾何以觀之哉言上不寬大包容臣下則不能居聖位則為包容之容非睿智字明矣。今《漢書》刋本作䜭,非容非睿,亦失班氏之舊。念孫案:錢說是也。本志下篇曰:宋襄公區霿自用不容臣下,正所謂思心之不容也。《說苑·君道篇》尹文曰:人君之事無為而能容下大道容眾大德容下聖人寡為而天下理矣《書》曰:容作聖今本容作睿乃後人所改與上文不合此又一證也。今本《漢書》思曰䜭,本作思心曰容思心說見下應《注》:𧮲通也,古文作睿,本作容,寛也,古文作睿。容寬也,卽用班氏原文。睿與容不同字,故別之曰古文作睿若正文本作容而訓為通則容睿聲義竝同何必別言之平下文容作聖亦本是容作聖其注文張晏曰:容通達以至於聖七字文不成義亦是後人所攺也又案上文五曰思本作五曰思心注文應劭曰:思思慮本作心思慮此是釋思心二字之義非專釋思字之義下篇曰思心之不容是謂不聖思心者心思慮也此卽應注所本後人旣於正文內刪去心字又改注文心思慮為思思慮甚矣其妄也其《春秋繁露》之五曰思思曰容思下無心字亦是後人所刪《洪範五行傳》曰次五事曰思心思心之不容是謂不聖今本攺作入五事曰心維思心之不容是謂不聖據鄭《注》及《續漢書》《晉書》《隋書》〈五行志〉所引訂正又本志中篇曰𭄘歆以為屬思心不容又曰:𭄘歆以為思心勝蟲孽也下篇曰思心氣毁故有牛禍又曰:凡思心傷者病土氣又曰:𭄘歆思心《傳》曰:時則有羸蟲之驚又曰:思心失逆土氣又曰:貌言視聽思心五事皆失〈蓺文志〉曰貌言視聽思心失而五行之序亂思下皆有心字葢《古文尚書》作五曰思思曰睿睿作聖今文《尚書》作五曰思心思心曰容容作聖《漢書》及《五行傳》《春秋繁露》《說苑》皆本今文故與古文不同後人見古文而不見今文故以其所知攺其所不知也又本志下篇曰梁孝王田北山有獻牛足上出背上𭄘向以為近牛禍〈內則〉思慮霜亂外則土功過制故牛毗作思慮亦本作思心而後人改之也下文曰:周景王思心霿亂敘傳曰思心既霿牛既告妖《漢紀·孝景紀》曰梁王北獵梁山有獻牛足出背上本志以為牛禍思心瞀亂之咎也皆其證矣又律麻志宮為土為信為思思下無心字亦是後人所刪〈天文志〉曰塡星曰中央季夏土信也思心也義正與此同下文貌言視聽以心為主心上亦當有思字《漢紀·孝武紀》曰宮為土為信為思心此尤其明證今本作為思為心下為字因上而衍

Enjoy this site? Please help.Site design and content copyright 2006-2024. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to https://ctext.org. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here.